![]() ![]() “eFolder's encryption strategy is designed to support businesses with the strictest compliance and security requirements. The entire essence of file sync, share, and collaboration is lost.” Pierre TapiaĪnd from Pierre Tapia, VP of product, eFolder: For example, with end-to-end encryption, organizations are no longer able to share public links to content, collaborate online, perform web editing, and mobile rendering of files. Services that are end-to-end encrypted are strictly focused on specific use cases and will severely limit the functionality of file sharing solutions. Our service is SOC2 audited, HIPAA compliant, and supports encryption both in transit and at rest to guard against unwanted breaches of sensitive information. Autotask is focused on meeting much broader file sync and share business needs for our customers. The Keybase service that you refer to is a very limited and isolated tool that addresses a very specific need delivering an encrypted file end-to-end. End-to-end encryption is more appropriately classified as Enterprise Key Management rather than an FSS solution. “Currently Autotask Workplace does not provide end-to-end encryption. Their responses:įrom Pat Burns, VP of product management: When Keybase announced its end-to-end encryption offering last week, I reached out to Autotask and eFolder, seeking a better understanding of their respective encryption strategies. Both companies are profitable and in growth mode. But the risks of an implosion are relatively low for partners that work with Autotask and eFolder. There are simply too many options for partners and customers to consider. ![]() I certainly think we'll see a file sync and sharing market shakeout. In stark contrast, options like Autotask File Sync and Sharing and eFolder Anchor are channel-obsessed. But here's my general feeling: While Box and Dropbox have partner programs, their focus on the SMB channel sometimes wanders. I'm not in a position to "endorse" specific platforms since I haven't done any hands-on comparison testing. Names to know include BoxCrytor, Cloud Fogger, nCrypted Cloud, Sookasa and Viivo.Īmid all those options, I still recommend that VARs and MSPs seek out pure channel alternatives. And yes, rival Dropbox has some encryption know-how as well.Īlso of note: Numerous encryption and security solutions now support file sync and sharing services. Box KeySafe eliminates that complexity for SMBs, Box claims. The enterprise approach requires a tricky encryption key management system on Amazon Web Services. Meanwhile, Box has launched Box KeySafe - an encryption offering for SMB customers that don't want to deal with the company's more complex Enterprise Key Management option. That means it’s more suited to people who need a way to securely share files rather than those who simply want to free up space on their gadgets." As The Next Web puts it, "You’ll need a PGP key to secure your identity and there’s no option to sync files continuously from your desktop or mobile devices. It sounds promising but it isn't the same as traditional file sync and sharing. Plus, executives representing channel-centric offerings like Autotask File Sync and Sharing and eFolder Anchor have some strong opinions about proper security for VARs, MSPs and their SMB customers.Īmong the latest chatter: Message encryption service Keybase has launched a private beta of a new file sharing system that lets you upload files to the cloud and automatically encrypt as well as sign them with your PGP key, notes The Next Web. Some upstarts say they now offer better or more intuitive security than base consumer offerings like Box and Dropbox. ![]() Within the very crowded market for cloud-based file sync and sharing services, the encryption buzz s growing louder.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |